ADHESION OF A SEALANT WITH PRE-REACTED GLASS IONOMER PARTICLES UNDER SALIVARY CONTAMINATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Authors

  • Milena Rodrigues Carvalho Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Carolina Paes Torres Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Maria da Conceição Pereira Saraiva Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Lucas Masaru Marubayashi Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Fernanda Vicioni Marques Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Maria Cristina Borsatto Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29327/244963.7.3-6

Keywords:

giomer, pediatric dentistry, salivary contamination, sealant, shear bond strength

Abstract

Objective: this in vitro study compared the adhesive strengths of the resin sealant with the Giomer technology sealant under salivary contamination. Materials and Methods: fifty-two bovine incisors were randomly divided into four groups (n=13): GI, a resin sealant (Fluroshield®) without salivary contamination (control of GII); GII, Fluroshield sealant + salivary contamination; GIII, a Giomer technology sealant (BeautiSealant®) without salivary contamination (control of GIV); and GIV, BeautiSealant® sealant + salivary contamination. In the salivary contamination groups, artificial saliva was used through a pipette, and after 20 s, it was air-dried and the sealant was applied. Shear strength tests were performed using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA variance and Tukey’s test were used for multiple comparisons. The fracture types were analyzed using a stereomicroscope with

40X magnification. Results: the means and standard deviations (SD) of adhesion for Fluroshield® and BeautiSealant® in the group without salivary contamination were 15.27 (±0.96) and 11.90 (±0.94), and for the group with salivary contamination,

13.14 (±1.03) and 8.95 (±1.33), respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference between GI and GII p=0.020, GIII and GIV p=0.041. Mixed failures were detected in GI (38%), GII (44%), GIII (38%), and GIV (62%). Conclusion: there was a statistically significant decrease in the adhesive strength values in the groups with salivary contamination for both the sealants studied. However, no significant difference was observed between the two sealants when the materials used were compared.

Published

2023-01-01